by Dept. of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Mass .
Written in English
|Statement||Jeffrey E. Harris|
|Series||Working paper / Dept. of Economics -- no. 460, Working paper (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics) -- no. 460.|
|Contributions||Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||56 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||56|
This book examines the interaction of economics and the delivery of cancer care in the global context. It analyses the causes of tension between those paying for care, those providing the care and those marketing drugs and devices. The concept and requirement for rationing is examined in different economic by: Cancer is most important causes of death worldwide, breast and prostate cancer are two of the majority widespread malignancies, and causing social and financial burden to the patients. As per the stats about 10 million new cases are diagnosed and over 6 million deaths happen worldwide per annum, not including non-melanoma skin cancer [ 16 ].Author: Vairakannu Tamizhazhagan, Kannaiyan Pugazhendy. Cancer is the second most common cause of death in the US, exceeded only by heart disease. Cancer costs us billions of dollars. It also costs us the people we love. Reducing barriers to cancer care is critical in the fight to eliminate suffering and death due to cancer. We have a lot more information that you might find helpful. The Social Cancer, original title Noli me tangere, novel by Filipino political activist and author José Rizal, published in The book, written in Spanish, is a sweeping and passionate unmasking of the brutality and corruption of Spanish rule in the Philippines (–).. The story begins at a party to welcome Crisóstomo Ibarra back to the Philippines after seven years of studying in.
City of Hope's Vijay Trisal, M.D., shares insight on the social, psychological and financial impact of cancer. The economic burden of cancer is substantial in all countries and reflects health care spending as well as lost productivity due to morbidity and premature death from cancer. As cancer treatment costs increase, prevention and early detection efforts become more cost-effective, and potentially cost-saving. However, the extent of economic analysis of cancer is relatively modest in the UK, with little sustained funding and few centres of expertise. Its impact on cancer research, clinical practice and government policy has therefore been limited. Thus far economic research has been hampered by a lack of data linking the processes, outcomes and costs. It also says social deprivation is linked to lung and cervical cancer, “because people from poorer classes are more likely to smoke and to skip smear tests”. The story is based on a study that compares socioeconomic-specific incidence rates of breast, skin, lung and cervical cancer diagnosed between and in England.
To understand disparities in cancer incidence and outcome, there is a need to understand the circumstances in which cancer occurs. Poverty (low economic status), culture, and social injustice are believed to be the three principle determinants of cancer disparities. These factors are interrelated and, to some extent, superimposed. A family history of certain cancers can be a sign of a possible inherited cancer syndrome. (See the Hereditary Cancer Syndromes section for more information about inherited genetic mutations that can cause cancer.) Most cancer risk (and protective) factors are initially identified in epidemiology studies. This analysis “represents the largest study to date to address ethnic differences in survival for melanoma while accounting for disparities in treatment and social and economic factors, Zell said. a landmark study of the economic cost of all causes of death globally, including cancer and other noncommunicable and communicable diseases. Cancer is the world’s leading cause of death, followed by heart disease and stroke. This critical new joint report, authored by Dr. Rijo John and Dr.